NEW PAGE as of June 13, 2026:

Alpha Lin targets, assaults, and tortures some patients. The following are the details of the each surgery he performs as well as his sadistic and psychopathic routine. This is based on my surgeries and surgeries of other victims.

On Dr. Lin’s operative report and surgical overview, he writes he performed a Shouldice, McVay, and Halstead repair. Despite a dozen requests I have made for details about what he actually did, Dr. Lin has refused to provide any additional information despite knowing how horrible and debilitating my symptoms are. My brother, a surgeon who graduated from Johns Hopkins medical school, also reached out to Dr. Lin requesting details about all the steps taken and where all the sutures are located in my body. It took Dr. Lin nearly 6 weeks to respond to my brother before sending a falsified operative procedure, which is shared on webpage, The Truth About the Integrated Hernioplasty. 

Below are the details of the actual surgery Dr. Lin performed on me and Dr. Lin’s routine by which he assaults and tortures targeted patients. Dr. Lin claims he performs the same surgery at the link above on all of his patients. Dr. Lin also denies the existence of most of the sutures listed below, of which I have actual specimens, pictures, and mentions in multiple operative reports performed by different experienced, highly qualified surgeons. 

SURGERY #1

1. Procedure: Dr. Lin unevenly folded my external oblique over itself and heavily sutured it in a disorganized way just superior to my pubic tubercle. The complex hernia revision specialist at the Cleveland Clinic said he had never seen anything like it or had no idea why he did it. Also, the incision was also 4 cm inferior to the normal location of incisions for indirect inguinal hernias. The reason for the strange incision location is likely because Dr. Lin wanted to, first, pull my external oblique down under high tension before proceeding with the rest of the surgery. 

• Effect: Extremely high tension that made me unable to stand up straight. It caused deep bruising pain locally. Any movements (e.g. coughing, sneezing, laughing) that caused contraction of my abdominal wall resulted in significant localized pain. This was done about 6 cm from the hernia defect. This area should not have been operated on at all. Dr. Lin did this for three purposes: 1) to cause high tension, immobility, pain, and suffering, 2) to create a inferior and slightly lateral shift in the position of the external oblique relative to the internal oblique and transversus abdominis in the area of the iliohypogastric nerve (for purposes of 5 and 6 below), and 3) to force the patient to return for a revision surgery, after which he would start the “Delayed Torture Timer” discussed in Normal Sadistic Routine below

     2. Procedure: Similar to 1), my external oblique was folded over itself, pulled laterally over the area of the ilioinguinal nerve, and sutured into the inguinal ligament at the superior end of the inguinal ligament. 

• Effect: The external oblique shifts laterally and doesn’t create many symptoms. Dr. Lin claims this was done for a comprehensive reconstruction of the abdominal area. This is nonsense. The area is not prone to herniation, was not weak, and lateral to the abdominal cavity. This archaic Halstead technique was only ever used to reinforce very bad hernias at the site of the hernia. I had a normal hernia and the technique was done in an area not related to any hernia. The real purpose of this suture was part of his Delayed Torture Timer to be discussed below.

     3. Procedure: The hernia defect at the internal ring is closed and the conjoint tendon is attached to the inguinal            ligament. (This is the only normal part of the surgery.)

     4. Procedure: Dr. Lin placed a permanent suture inside my internal ring compressing my spermatic cord and genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve. 

• Effect: Daily sharp orchialgia in my right testicle. Dr. Lin mentions putting a suture to close the internal ring and claimed he made the internal ring too tight. The truth is that the suture was inside my internal ring and not related to the closure. Moreover, a permanent suture should not be placed here, only a dissolvable suture, such as a Vicryl or PDS-2 suture. Initially, Dr. Lin claimed this was the only reason why I had such extreme tension and immobility right after his surgery and the reason why I should return for a revision surgery. He later changed the reason for my extreme tension to the attachment of the conjoint tendon to the inguinal ligament, a normal part of a non-mesh repair. Neither explanation makes sense. The purpose of the suture inside of my internal ring was to cause damage and scarring to the spermatic cord/genitofemoral nerve and testicular pain.

     5. Procedure: Dr. Lin placed a suture on my ilioinguinal nerve near the internal ring. 

• Effect: Nerve damage and pain. Shocking electric pain in my upper inner thigh, lower groin and base of my genitalia. Burning pain in the inguinal area. Numbness along the groin crease and just medial.

Dr. Lin put Prolene sutures (in steps 6 – 9 below and some pictured below) in through the anterior side of the external oblique and deep into my body after step 1 and step 2 above when the external oblique is pulled into an abnormal position relative to the more posterior abdominal wall layers.

     6. Procedure: 4 cm along the ilioinguinal nerve above the internal ring, Dr. Lin placed a suture (the middle suture pictured above) in through the external oblique and around the transversus abdominis, encircling the ilioinguinal nerve. 

• Effect: I had this suture in for 8 months and I only noticed some tension from this spot in the first couple months after surgery. Tension here caused a mild indentation which formed the bottom side of a band of tension that was about 3 – 4 cm in width that ran from the ASIS and 3 – 4 cm below the ASIS to my midline in a slightly descending direction. Otherwise, it was asymptomatic until the many sutures (in step 1 above) near my pubic tubercle were removed and the sutures in step 8 and 9 below pulled through my external oblique, whereupon my external oblique tried to shift back to its normal position relative to the internal oblique, ilioinguinal nerve, and transversus abdominis. Because the suture was put in when the external oblique was in an unnatural position, the strongest layer (the external oblique) began shifting superiorly and laterally and the Prolene suture over many weeks slowly cut through my transversus abdominis and then began compressing directly against my ilioinguinal nerve. The pain increased substantially over this period of time and when it finally cut through the muscle, the pain was so intense and I had lots of swelling in the area that it sent me to the ER. This is the first instance of what I call “Delayed Timer Torture.” The pressure of the external oblique against the internal oblique was so intense (because my abdominal wall tried to move back to a normal position but was restricted by the suture) that a tight adhesion formed between my internal oblique and external oblique resulting in severe structural weakness. It should be noted that the external oblique and internal oblique normally slide significantly during everyday movements. So an adhesion between these two layers is medically significant. The suture was designed to also transect the ilioinguinal nerve. Fortunately, I got the suture out in time. However, I lived almost constantly in fetal position (sitting and lying on my right side) for 3 months until surgical removal.

     7. Procedure: 3 cm medial and inferior to 6), Dr. Lin placed another Prolene suture (the left suture pictured above) in a similar way encircling my iliohypogastric nerve just inferior to the location where the iliohypogastric nerve emerges through the internal oblique. The location is significant, because it would help to ensure that the iliohypogastric nerve is cut by the suture after the external oblique shifts superiorly when the sutures near the pubic tubercle are removed. Dr. Lin placed a second suture (the right suture pictured above) encircling my iliohypogastric nerve another 3 cm distal or further down the nerve from the other suture in step 7. A total of two Prolene sutures were placed encircling my iliohypogastric nerve in this step. 

• Effect: These sutures caused electric shocks near my pubic tubercle and pubic symphysis at the nerve endings. The compression of the nerve also caused nerve pain to shoot up into my flank and into my belly area. The sutures also caused partial numbness in a line directly above the nerve during the first month after 1) was released. Numbness spread throughout the lower groin area in the innervation zone of the iliohypogastric nerve in months two and three after 1) was released and 8) and 9) pulled through my external oblique. This is the second instance of Delayed Timer Torture. In sum, the two sutures were designed to destroy the iliohypogastric nerve and damage the abdominal wall.

    8. Procedure: Dr. Lin manually pressed the midpoint of my abdominal wall (where it is thickest) laterally and posteriorly until it was effectively touching the anterior side of my pelvis just lateral to my femoral nerve and then sutured my abdominal wall into the periosteum below my ASIS my pelvis causing unimaginably extreme tension. The suture heads were located 3 – 4 cm medial and 1 cm inferior to the ASIS and caused my abdomen to shift laterally 2 – 3 cm and posteriorly causing significant physical disfigurement. 

• Effect: This suture was the main contributor to making my lower right abdomen as flat as a wall and made sitting upright impossible, because it is very painful and causes the muscle to tear, especially without wearing a tight binder. My umbilicus shifted about 2 cm to the right and it caused my abdominal wall to be compressed posteriorly. This was observed many times visually and in an advanced CT scan. Dr. Lin stated the that shift in my abdomen was because of the connecting of the conjoint tendon and inguinal ligament. That is a fatuous lie. The tension from this, 1), and 2) made me unable to stand up straight comfortably and prevented me from being able to walk normally. I could not move my leg backwards. I had a limp for over a year. The tension created hypertrophy in the upper front side of my quadricep and atrophy in the gluteus. The hypertrophy and atrophy further exacerbate my biomechanics when walking or moving leading to popping sensations and pain in my hip. The tension caused tearing in my abdominal wall repeatedly over time at the site of the suture as the suture functioned like cheese wires for the layers between the external oblique and where it was anchored. It caused the aponeurosis of my abdominal wall to tear from the aponeurosis of the rectus abdominis, which was the weakest spot along the line of tension. The suture caused my pelvis to dramatically rotate and tilt, the worst ever seen by an OMT specialist I have been seeing. This suture also played a key role in Dr. Lin’s Delayed Timer Torture. It immobilizes the entire right side of my abdominal wall below the suture, allowing the sutures in 6) and 7) placed in through the external oblique, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis to remain largely asymptomatic for 8 months. 

9. Procedure: Dr. Lin placed a second suture about 0.5 cm medial to 8) from the external oblique to the iliacus.

• Effect: This suture was under less tension than 8). Its purpose wasn’t to create tension, immobilize my abdominal wall, or cause my abdominal wall to shift laterally and posteriorly. By being anchored in the iliacus adjacent to the femoral nerve corridor, once the suture head is cut off in Dr. Lin’s second surgery, the suture legs pull deep into the abdomen and move around with normal movements. The sharp ends of the suture legs poke around in the femoral nerve corridor, a highly sensitive and highly innervated area. The result of this is a cocktail of horrific pain symptoms down the front side of your leg. This is the third instance of Delayed Timer Torture.
• Other Effects (of surgery in general): Chronic pain and immobility. I cannot go anywhere because I cannot walk. I have had pain in my ilioinguinal nerve, iliohypogastric nerve, femoral nerve, and testicular pain. I have had nerve pain symptoms in my suprapubic region, leg, belly, flank, and sometimes in my chest. I have a badly rotated pelvis, which prevents me from being able to walk normally. Because all the sutures have been removed, my pain is improving, but it remains to be seen how much my body can actually recover after what is hopefully the fifth and final surgery.

 

Lin Dian-Yu’s Normal Sadistic Psychopathic Routine 

To his targeted victims, it appears Dr. Lin performs the same first surgery. Dr. Lin seems to bank on the fact that the patient will have no choice but to return for a second surgery due to extreme pain and immobility. However, due to a number of reasons, it was very obvious to me that whatever Dr. Lin did was intentional and designed to cause harm and that he was lying and attempting to manipulate me. And thus I couldn’t trust him and I didn’t return for the second surgery. 

SURGERY #2

After the first surgery, the tension is so high that it causes visible shifting in the abdominal wall and is thus detectable in imaging or if the patient’s physical appearance is closely observed. The patient has such extreme tension that they cannot move or walk normally. A Taiwanese friend of mine, who I met with three days after my surgery, said that I walked like a 120 year old man. The purpose of the second surgery is to release all the tension by removing or cutting the heads off all the sutures causing tension (1, 2, 8, and also 9 above) and leave the Delayed Timer Torture sutures (6, 7, and 9 above) intact. So, after the second surgery, the patient notices total tension relief and normal biomechanics. However, as discussed above, the Delayed Timer Torture sutures were put in when the abdominal wall was in an unnatural position (specifically the external oblique was significantly shifted laterally and inferiorly by sutures 1 and 2) and the removal of the tension sutures cause the external oblique to shift back to its normal, natural position and move more freely. Because the external oblique is stronger than the muscle layers below, the sutures cut through the muscle and nerves they are targeting. More specifically, the removal of suture 2) causes a significal medial shift in external oblique which results in suture 6) over time cutting through first, the transversus abdominis, then transecting the ilioinguinal nerve, and lastly cutting through the internal oblique. The removal of the many sutures in 1) causes the two sutures in 7) to cut through the internal oblique and transect the iliohypogastric nerve. Also and importantly, the suture heads of 8) and 9) are cut off allowing the significant shift in the external oblique to happen and largely restoring normal movement of the abdominal wall. Moreover, the suture legs remain hidden and embedded in the anterior side of the pelvis and iliacus and cause irritation and inflamation affecting the femoral nerve causing pain down the leg.

All of these sutures (6, 7, 8, and 9) are far outside the normal area of inguinal hernia surgery and none are detectable by any tests or imaging. So, according to normal professional medical standards, doctors will normally only send the patient to pain management and the offending sutures will forever cause pain and destroy the patient’s quality of life. Even in a normal exploratory surgery, a neurologist or hernia surgeon would check the inguinal area, in which he might find the suture on the ilioinguinal nerve at the internal ring. However, even a neurectomy just above that location would provide no relief as the nerve is being damaged 3 – 4 cm higher up along the nerve in a spot no surgeon would ever think to check and normally would have no reason to. Dr. Lin not only knows all of this mentioned above, but it is his design. This is part of what makes him so evil and sadistic. Dr. Lin’s plan of torture spans at least three surgeries and takes advantage of normal professional medical standards.

So what happens when the patient returns after Surgery #2? A month or two after the second surgery, the patient will have enough pain symptoms to cause them to return to Dr. Lin to discuss all the new pain symptoms. He claims it is scar tissue from the multiple surgeries. Dr. Lin then manipulates them by expressing concern about their well being and often offers to pay for their medical care. This is obviously done to manipulate so that the patient wouldn’t suspect wrongdoing. Dr. Lin tells the patient he will send them to a top hospital to get checked out. Dr. Lin then sends the patient to one specific doctor, a crony urologist, Yen-Hwa Chang, at Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Nothing is found at the hospital. Dr. Lin continues to act concerned and says he has no idea what is wrong and cuts the patient loose. 

SURGERY #3

If the patient complains again of pain after a year, which the patient will because multiple nerves have been cut and/or compressed in multiple locations and the patient experiences excruciating pain all over. He then tells the patient he needs to remove their nerves. He claims that this is the advice from professional colleagues of his at the Taiwan Hernia Society. If a patient goes back for a third surgery, he likely cuts the neuromas off the the cut nerves and buries them in muscle, performing a neurectomy after torturing the patient for a year or more. I cannot say whether the deep sutures are ever removed. The patient will have permanent numbness throughout their lower abdomen because he cuts three nerves. It stands to reason the patient will still have ongoing pain permanently.

The depth of knowledge required and the elaborate nature of the whole sadistic manipulative routine as well as Dr. Lin’s willingness to pay costs related other medical expenses go to show just how evil, sadistic, and psychopathic Lin Dian-Yu is.